|
|
|
This includes all:
· University Animal Care (UAC) staff
· investigators and their technical staff
· instructors and students involved with animal related work.
and some personnel in:
· facilities management
· security
· custodial services
As well as certain students, consultants, volunteers and visiting scholars.
Non-University of Arizona students or employees who will be performing animal work as defined above at the University of Arizona must also comply with this HSI. Documentation of meeting the AHP components must be filed with the Occupational Health Service [OHS] (http://www.health.arizona.edu) before the commencement of the work. The OHS can perform medical procedures on non-university students or employees in some circumstances.
Program Exemption
-
Personnel who work solely with standard animal biological products such as organs, tissues, cells, or antibodies obtained from vendors may be exempt from program participation. In order to qualify for exemption, a current animal health report from the vendor must be supplied to the University Animal Care clinical veterinarian for review and approval.
-
Personnel whose
OSD has signed the exemption statement on the Risk Assessment
Questionnaire, which states that they will have no contact with
animals, animal tissues, fluids or wastes, nor will they enter
animal areas. This is often administrative personnel who are
listed on a protocol.
-
Personnel whose
contact is limited to in-vitro work with animals, tissues, fluids or
wastes that have been sterilized chemically or via autoclaving.
Risk is a statement of probability that harm, injury, or disease will occur in the occupational setting. The degree of risk can, and does, vary with an assortment of factors.
Risk assessment is the evaluation of scientific information on the hazardous properties of an agent and on the extent of human exposure that yields a qualitative or quantitative statement of the probability and degree of risk or harm estimated for individuals or populations.
Hazard is a recognized risk. Once a risk is recognized and assessed, appropriate adjustments can be made to modify the underlying factors that contribute to the risk, or behaviors can be modified to reduce exposure to those risks. The risks can be abated through engineering controls, personal protective equipment, and by administrative control to include: modifying practices and procedures, pre-placement and periodic examinations, training, etc.
Safe is the state of being free from risk or when an acceptable level of risk has been achieved.
Participants are
assigned a category(ies) that reflect the general surveillance needs of the individuals based on real or potential occupational exposure to specific species of animals.
The assessment of risk will also be based upon frequency of contact,
intensity of exposure, hazards associated with the animals being
handled, hazardous properties of agents used in research, the
susceptibility of individual employees, the hazard-control measures
available, and the occupational history of individual employees.
Requirements
-
Enrollment in the Animal Hazard Program must occur prior to the employees or participants exposure to animals, their viable tissues, body fluids, or wastes. It is a requirement for IACUC certification.
Enrollment consists of completing and submitting the Animal Hazards
Risk Assessment Questionnaire to the Occupational Health Service.
-
All participating faculty, staff, employees, students, and volunteers will be queried via the University of Arizonas Risk Assessment Questionnaire regarding anticipated exposure to animals. The Risk Assessment Questionnaire may be obtained from the Occupational Health Service (621-2568), is available at the Introduction to Animal Hazards Program training class, or may be downloaded from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees web page
(http://www.uac.arizona.edu/forms/uacformspage.shtml).
-
Every lab must appoint one individual that serves as the Occupational Safety Designee (OSD). This individual, along with the Principal Investigator (PI), is responsible for occupational safety concerns for their research group (see Figure 1). Protocol forms provide a space for PIs to indicate their OSD. Any protocols submitted without a specified Occupational Safety Designee will not be routed for IACUC review.
-
The appropriate administrative staff in support departments, such as Facilities Management and Security, will determine which employees are to be enrolled in the program (those at risk through environmental exposure no direct animal contact, Category 8).
-
Individuals who have not registered with the Animal Hazards Program are subject to having facilities access denied and protocol authorization/participation withdrawn.
-
Education:
-
All persons participating on any IACUC
reviewed and approved project must receive certification to
"Introduction to the Animal Hazards Program" and "Laws and
Regulations: located at
www.iacuc.arizona.edu/training. Topics presented as employee
information will include, but are not limited to:
-
Program function and coverage description
-
Important zoonoses of animals
-
Points of contact for additional information
-
Provision of informational handouts on
topical matters.
-
OSD Requirements: The OSD for each
research group is responsible for assuring that all members of the
research group are adequately informed of, and receive training in,
Occupational Safety issues, and are in compliance with program
requirements (See Figure 1). The Occupational Safety Designee
(OSD) will need to attain certification in all species specific
classes on zoonotic diseases that are germane to the specific areas
of research undertaken by the research group. The PI and OSD
may choose how best to train members of the individual research
group in these issues, which may include their also taking the
zoonotic disease classes. If the PI./OSD choose to
provide training to staff, they must document content and attendees.
-
All persons
should have completed the Introduction to Animal Hazards Program
class as soon as possible and not longer than four months after
their initial hire date. If a Principal Investigator has not
received proper certification, their protocols will not be reviewed
for approval. Technicians/Participants who are not properly
certified will not be authorized to participate on protocols.
-
Training will be
under the auspices of the IACUC. The Department of University
Animal Care (UAC) and the OHS will provide technical instruction and
assistance.
Reporting Injuries and
Infections
-
Duty Site
Surveillance of Work Related Injuries:
-
Injury and
Infection Log: Every animal holding facility and animal research
laboratory will maintain an Injury and Infection Log to include
the following categories:
-
Date of
injury or infection
-
Time of
injury or infection
-
Type of
injury or infection
-
Date of
employee referral to OHS
-
Time of
employee referral to OHS
-
Reporting Work Related Injuries: Every
person working with animals should be aware of the potential
danger from animal bites. Although an animal scratch or bite
might not seem serious, its occurrence should be reported to
one's supervisor or instructor so that proper measures may be
taken. In addition, employees and students shall promptly
report all suspected work related injuries and illnesses:
-
Weekdays between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Wednesdays between 9 a.m.
and 4:30 p.m.: Report to the Occupational Health Service
(621-4427) at the Campus Health Center.
-
After work hours: Report to any Urgent Care facility or
Emergency Room and inform them that your Workers Compensation
Carrier is the Arizona Department of Administration, Risk
Management Section.
-
When an injury or illness has occurred, a Supervisors Report of
Employee Injury/Illness form (http://fp.arizona.edu/riskmgmt/insurance_forms_on.htm) must be filed with the UA Department of Risk Management and Safety within 7 calendar days.
-
Several of the agents responsible for viral, bacterial, and parasitic infections in laboratory animals are capable of infecting humans. Employees are counseled to report any gastrointestinal, eye, respiratory or skin illnesses that may resemble the signs or symptoms of infections in the animals for which they are caring.
Personal
Hygiene
-
There are a number of personal hygiene issues that apply to all workers who are exposed to animals.
-
There should
be no eating, drinking, smoking, or applying of cosmetics in
areas where animals are housed or used.
-
Laboratory coats should be worn over street clothes when working
with animals - this will minimize the contamination of street
clothing. Laboratory clothes should be left in the lab and
should not be worn when eating or in public eating areas.
Laboratory clothing should be laundered routinely - see chemical
hygiene plan.
-
Careful hand washing should be done after handling of animals
and prior to leaving the laboratory.
-
All work surfaces should be decontaminated daily and after any
spill of animal related material.
-
Certain infections are transmitted from animals to humans
primarily by the animal feces or urine contaminating someones hands and then contaminating objects put into the mouth. Examples of organisms utilizing this mode of transmission are species of Salmonella, Shigella, and Entamoeba.
Every precaution should be taken to avoid this mode of
transmission by alertness and careful personal hygiene.
Additional health problems are encountered when these organisms
are carried home and children/family members are exposed.
Occupational Health Provisions
-
Basic Occupational Health Care (BOHC):
-
Care Plan:
-
Prior to beginning animal work, all participants must
receive certification in Introduction to Animal Hazards
program. Submission of the Risk Assessment
Questionnaire is part of the IACUC certification requirements. The Risk Assessment Questionnaire must be updated whenever an employee changes jobs or animal species, or as deemed necessary by the Animal Hazards Committee or Occupational Health.
-
The questionnaire will be reviewed by the Occupational
Health Service and a clinic visit may be scheduled depending
on level of risk or in accordance with specific job
requirements. If not otherwise required, individuals
may decline the clinic visit, but must file a formal
declination with Occupational Health. This information
will be forwarded to the OSD or supervisor for their records.
-
The recommendations made by the provider at the visit will
be based on the functional requirements of the position, the
type of animal contact, and the individuals medical
history. Any persons declining to obtain recommended
inoculations or testing will be required to sign a
declination form. This information will be forwarded
to the OSD or supervisor for their records.
-
Surveillance
Recall: Employees and students (participants) who are
enrolled in the Animal Hazards Program are periodically recalled
for medical follow-up depending on the specific types of animal
exposure.
-
Surveillance Recall Schedules: See Table 4
-
Notices
for surveillance are sent to the employee and/or employee's
OSD or supervisor and appointments scheduled with the OHS.
-
The OSD/PI/Supervisor
is/are notified of an employee's or individual's
participation in the surveillance program via memo or email
from the OHS. The IACUC and the OSD/PI/Supervisor
is/are informed of an employee's non-participation,
noncompliance or submission of a declination to participate
with the program by memo or email.
-
Diseases/Immunizations: Participants, depending on their
specific exposure, will have the following vaccinations
documented:
-
Tetanus
Prophylaxis: The Public Health Service Advisory Committee on
Immunization Practices (ACIP) (http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/acip-list.htm#Vaccine)
recommends immunization against tetanus every 10 years for
everyone. It is also recommended if a particularly
tetanus-prone injury occurs in an employee where more than
five years has elapsed since the last immunization. Every
employee should have up to date tetanus immunizations.
Bites and Scratches:
any wound may potentially serve as a source from which tetanus may
result. A trained health care provider will evaluate all wounds to
assess contamination and likelihood of infection, as well as determine
proper treatment. Tetanus boosters are required every 10 years. If a
wound occurs, persons who have previously received a full primary series
of tetanus immunizations may not require a booster if less than 5 years
has elapsed since the last immunization. This is dependent, however,
upon severity of the wound, degree of contamination, and circumstances
surrounding the injury. It is strongly recommended that all wounds be
seen and treated despite the persons status of tetanus immunization.
-
Rabies
is a relatively rare and devastating viral disease that can
result in severe neurological problems and death. Most
cases of rabies occur in wild animals although any mammal
can contract the disease. The disease is virtually unheard
of in common laboratory animals. The exception to this is
with dogs and cats. At the University of Arizona, random
source research dogs and cats are vaccinated against rabies
and are quarantined for 14 days. All bites of any type
should be reported immediately to ones supervisor.
Rabies
is an endemic disease in Arizona, especially in skunks,
foxes, and bats. Sporadic cases have been well documented
in other species of wildlife, as well as domestic animals.
Animals and animal tissue field-collected in Arizona should
be handled with care. Precautions should take into account
that infected animals may shed the virus in the saliva
before visible signs of illness appear, that a bite is not
required to contract rabies - contact with saliva may be
sufficient, and that rabies virus can remain viable in
frozen tissues for an extended period. (http://www.health.arizona.edu/pdf/rabies-info.pdf).
Based on
current ACIP (http://www.cdc.gov/nip/publications/acip-list.htm#Vaccine)
recommendations, rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis with human
diploid cell rabies vaccine (HDCV) is provided to the
following employee groups:
-
Those working directly with the rabies virus,
-
Those having random source dog and cat contact,
-
Those having direct contact with Categories 2, 3,
4, and 5 animals,*
-
Those having exposure to potentially infected animal
body organs or performing post mortem examinations
on animals with a history of poorly defined
neurological disorders,
-
Those having responsibility for capturing or
destroying wild animals on University of Arizona
property (excluding birds and rodents),
-
Wildlife mammalogists and students engaged in the
handling and/or capture of susceptible species.
-
Post
Exposure - See Table 3
-
Participants may formally decline this prophylactic vaccine
and may still participate in other parts of the program.
-
Serologic
monitoring and booster doses:
-
Serologic monitoring will be performed every two years.
-
Booster doses are administered to employees with
inadequate titer. Inadequate titer is
defined by the Centers for Disease Control and
prevention as <1:5 by the rapid fluorescent focus
inhibition test.
*At the University
of Arizona, the CDC Frequent Exposure classification is applied to all
members of these categories. In reality, many or most have only
Infrequent Exposure. These exposures are based more on the prevalence
of rabies in the Southern Arizona fauna than on actual human exposure to
the virus. Field workers are occasionally exposed to rabies, but
laboratory and animal care workers are not. Dogs and cats used in
research are vaccinated. Bats and certain other wild animals transmit
the vast majority of rabies. Only under exceptional circumstances is a
wild animal present in a UofA facility.
Farm animals are
monitored, protected and in some cases vaccinated, however are subject
to attack by bats as well as other wild and domestic rabid species.
Field researchers, while not always working directly with rabies prone
species, are at increased risk due to greater environmental exposure.
Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory workers, Veterinarians and researchers
that utilize the rabies virus in their protocols are at Frequent or
Continuous risk of rabies exposure. These groups need to be immunized
against rabies.
For this reason, the
Animal Hazards Committee, in its January 24, 2007 meeting, elected to
suspend routine rabies immunization and serology for all participants
except:
1.
Field researchers that closely handle, study or trap rabies prone
species.
2.
Other field or agriculture researchers who spend sufficient time
in the field, or overnight, so as to be at risk for random exposure from
indigenous rabies prone animals.
3.
Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory workers
4.
Veterinarians
5.
Any participant working in a laboratory where the rabies virus is
present
6.
Occasional others with individual situations/needs.
7.
In adherence to the Americans With Disabilities Act, and Arizona
law, no individual will be required to receive rabies immunization.
Declination of the vaccination, may, at the discretion of their
supervisor, preclude employment in certain positions and assignment to
certain duties.
-
Influenza
Immunization: Based on CDC recommendations (see: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/professional/possible-exposure.htm),
all individuals who will have contact with birds or poultry, or who
will be working with the influenza virus in a laboratory setting,
should receive the annual influenza immunization.
For
those working with birds/poultry, currently available Flu
vaccines do not directly protect humans from acquiring
Avian Influenza. However, individuals that work with birds
could acquire both the Avian flu and the Human flu,
concurrently. The result could be potentially life
threatening AND, the affected individual could become a
human incubator offering the two viruses the opportunity to
combine in to a new, devastating human influenza.
-
Testing
-
Participants in certain categories will have either
semi-annual Tb skin testing (TST) documented.
-
Other
programs may be included, such as the Hearing Conservation
Program
(http://fp.arizona.edu/riskmgmt/hearing_conservation.htm)
and the respiratory Protection Program(http://fp.arizona.edu/riskmgmt/respiratory_protection.htm).
See Figure 2 for guidelines on respirator use based on
exposures.
-
Other
Diseases/Issues
-
Allergies:
Allergy to animal hair and dander is common and therefore one of the
more important occupational problems occurring in workers exposed to
animals. Allergies can be manifested in a number of ways,
including: allergic rhinitis (a condition characterized by runny
nose and sneezing similar to hay fever); allergic conjunctivitis
(irritation and tearing of the eyes); asthma; or atopic dermatitis
(a skin condition which is caused by contact with a substance to
which an individual is allergic). Allergy to animals is
particularly common in workers exposed to animals such as cats,
rabbits, mice, rats, gerbils, and guinea pigs. Allergic reactions
can be caused by exposure to dander and debris from the skin and fur
of an animal, urine, saliva, or fecal matter. Exposure to animal
urine or feces may occur either through direct urine contact with
skin or more commonly by inhaling dust from the bottom of a cage
that has been contaminated with urine or fecal material.
People
who have a prior
personal history or family history of hay fever or eczema will be
more likely to develop asthma after contact with animals. These
people do not seem any more likely to develop rhinitis and
conjunctivitis than do those without such personal or family
history. Everyone should exercise certain precautions to attempt to
prevent animal allergy. These attempts should not be focused only
on people with an atopic or allergy history. Symptoms can develop
anywhere from months to years after a person begins working with
animals. A majority of the individuals who are going to develop
symptoms will do so within the first year. It is extremely unusual
to develop symptoms after more than three years of animal contact.
Certain procedures should be routinely followed in order to prevent
the development of animal allergy. Animals should be worked with in
well-ventilated areas to prevent build up of various particles in
the air. Workers may want to wear gloves to prevent direct exposure
to animals - this applies to animal urine and feces as well as to
animal dander. In order to prevent inhaling contaminated material,
cages should be changed frequently and respirators
should be worn during the changing of cages.
Despite the best
preventive techniques some individuals will develop an allergy after
contact with laboratory animals. Rarely, this will be so severe
that a person is forced to change his line of work. More commonly,
this can be controlled with the increased use of respirators
while working with animals and possibly medication.
Desensitization therapy (allergy shots) has been successful for some
individuals. Employees will be queried on allergy risk
-
Employees at increased risk for
developing work related allergies include those with a history
of pre-existing allergies, asthma, seasonal rhinitis, or eczema.
These individuals may be referred to Risk Management for the
Respiratory Protection Program.
-
Enrollees with suspected allergies
will be encouraged to seek evaluation through the Occupation
Health Service.
-
Referral for allergy testing will
be provided to employees at the discretion of the Occupational
Health Service and with the employee's consent.
For more information on allergies:
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/animalrt.html
-
Q Fever:
Q-fever is a disease caused by the microorganism Coxiella
burnetii which can be acquired by exposure to placental
membranes and fetuses from infected sheep or goats. There is an
especially high concentration of these infected materials in animals
at the time that the animals give birth, so particular care needs to
be used in handling newborn animals, placental tissues, and other
products of conception. This would include the placenta, amniotic
fluid, and blood or soiled bedding. In addition, individuals who
handle young sheep or goats up to six months of age are at higher
risk, as are individuals who participate in the routine care of
sheep or goats such as the animal care workers. This infection is
extremely contagious and has been reported to be spread by aerosol.
It is
extremely important that, should an employee who works with
sheep or goats develop an influenza type infection, he/she
mention to their physician the possibility of Q fever. Q fever
is something that would not routinely be thought of and this
diagnosis is often missed.
Individuals
with congenital heart disease, prior valvular heart disease, or
who have a chronic immunocompromised state should not work with
infected animals at the time of animal parturition (birth
process), and it is best that they not work with sheep and goats
at all (determined on a case by case basis). Immunocompromised
individuals would include those with AIDS or a positive blood
test for the AIDS virus (HIV), or immunocompromised because of
medications or certain chronic diseases.
In order to
limit the spread of Q fever, the IACUC has a separate compliance
policy for all personnel working with female sheep and goats (http://www.iacuc.arizona.edu/policies/approvedpolicies.htm).
At the time
of the enrollment exam, employees are assessed for their
likelihood of developing chronic sequelae should they acquire Q
Fever. Those employees with valvular or congenital heart
defects, or those who are receiving immunosuppressant drugs, or
splenectomized are advised of the potential risks involved and
medical clearance for employment will be determined by the OHS
on a case-by-case basis.
-
Toxoplasmosis: pregnant women should be cautioned about working
with cats in the laboratory setting. Pregnant animal
technicians who have been assigned to cat husbandry duties
should be reassigned to other jobs during pregnancy unless
titers are sufficient (see 1. below). Pregnant women who are
exposed to cats in other ways would be best to avoid this
exposure. There is no vaccine to protect humans
Toxoplasmosis antibody titers are determined on any female
employee of childbearing capacity who is occupationally exposed
to cats or their feces. A negative IgM test and an IgG antibody
of <1:1000 IU/ML
indicates immunity and no active infection is present.
Females of
childbearing capacity who lack immunity and plan to work
with cats are informed of their susceptibility and provided
additional educational information on toxoplasmosis. Her
supervisor will be advised (if requested by the employee) to
consider arranging a temporary job reassignment while a
susceptible employee is pregnant. When this is not possible,
consultation with the OHS will be encouraged to identify
alternative methods of employee protection.
-
Nonhuman
Primates
A large
number of illnesses can be passed from non-human primates such
as monkeys to humans and from humans to non-human primates.
Because of this, it is extremely important that employees
exposed to or handling monkeys exercise particular caution.
Protective clothing should always be worn, especially when
confronting primates. Awake animals (not used to being handled)
should be handled only while wearing bite proof gloves.
Ideally, animals should be sedated before procedures are
performed. Employees who are ill should not work with monkeys
since they may transmit diseases to the monkey. Personal
hygiene must be scrupulously maintained by all those exposed to
non-human primates. Any scratch, bite or eye exposure must be
immediately treated in accordance with instructions posted in
the lab or treatment room and then reported to the supervisor.
-
Tuberculosis: Tuberculosis can be devastating in a monkey
colony - special precautions are taken for individuals
working with non-human primates, their products, or care
devices. Periodic tuberculin skin testing (TST)
is performed every six months for all employees or
participants with non-human primate, product, or device
contact. To avoid misinterpretation of what is known as a
boosted reaction, a two-step PPD may be required for those
beginning a tuberculosis screening program or who have not
had a PPD within 12 months. A chest x-ray is performed at
an initial positive PPD reading or if there are symptoms
indicated on the Positive TB Questionnaire, or as
recommended by the CDC. If the chest x-ray is negative,
they are referred to their PCP or the County Health
Department for treatment of latent Tb.
-
Rubeola
(measles): Measles is a deadly disease in non-human primates
and has become more common. Nonhuman primates are
vaccinated against this disease to prevent transmission from
humans. Persons with active cases of measles will be
prohibited from any primate facility.
-
Cercopithecine herpesvirus 1 (Herpesvirus simiae or
B-virus): TC "CERCOPITHECINE HERPESVIRUS 1"\l 1 Herpes B or
Herpes simiae causes a very minor illness in macaque
monkeys, but can cause a
fatal illness in humans who contract the disease. In
humans, it causes severe neurologic disease that is most
frequently followed by death. Fortunately, transmission of
this disease to humans is quite rare. As mentioned above,
it is mandatory that caution be exercised and that a
supervisor is notified immediately regarding any bites,
scratches, or exposure of monkey excretions to mucous
membranes or the eyes. Medical care must be obtained. Any
wound should be carefully cleaned. Once a wound has been
acutely managed, any unusual manifestations that develop
later also need to be promptly reported. Symptoms of Herpes
B infection at a wound include pain radiating away from the
bite wound or blisters at the site of the wound. Again, it
must be emphasized that careful adherence to safe handling
procedures is the most important step in preventing
illnesses.
-
Since there is not a vaccine for this disease, training
in proper primate handling and care is essential.
Additionally, wound management procedures will be
reinforced during primate training sessions. These
procedures are posted in the animal room and inside
Monkey Exposure Kits.
-
Injury & Infection Log: Record all traumas (animal or
cage) in the Injury and Infection Log, which is
maintained by the facility supervisor.
-
The
University of Arizona adheres to the guidelines found in
the publication
Recommendations for Prevention of and Therapy for
Exposure to B Virus, CID 2002:35;1191- 12030.
BOHC Recommendations by Category
Please see Table 4 for specific
recommendations by category. Final recommendations for BOHC will
be based upon individual risk assessment and may vary from the above.
Enforcement and Compliance
-
PROCEDURES FOR REGULAR INSPECTIONS
OF THE WORKPLACE
-
Introduction. To achieve the Universitys goal to provide and
maintain the highest standard of health, safety and welfare for
its staff, and in accordance with this HSI, systems must be in
place to identify hazards in the workplace in order to allocate
appropriate resources and implement effective control
strategies. The University recognizes that regular health and
safety inspections are effective mechanisms for identifying
workplace hazards. The Animal Hazards Program requires each
animal use unit to:
-
Inspect
the work area for hazards on a frequent and systematic
basis, and document and evaluate the findings.
-
Analyze
and monitor work practices, procedures and systems of work
to identify hazards which may otherwise be overlooked; and
-
Develop
and implement a priority action plan for hazard control
-
These
inspection reports will provide a monitoring system for OSD's of
units.
-
The
Occupational Health Service is available for advice and
assistance, but is not charged with the responsibility to
accompany inspection parties. The following guidelines have
been developed to assist Units in the inspection process and may
be adapted to suit individual areas. In addition, the
Universitys regular seminars for supervisors and staff will
include a segment on inspection procedures.
-
Risk
Management and/or Health and Safety Representatives may be
invited to participate in the inspection, consulted when
determining priority for action, and when implementing control
strategies. Interested employees should also be invited to
participate.
-
DEFINITION
-
Regular
health and safety inspections are effective tools in the hazard
identification process. Together with accident investigation,
these inspections form the main thrust in good occupational
health and safety management. Not only do they provide an
opportunity to identify the sources of potential hazards, but
can be used to monitor occupational health and safety policies
and procedures and determine how effectively these are
translated into the workplace. The inspection process allows a
full examination and report on the status of occupational health
and safety performance in a work area.
-
Essentially,
it allows one to:
-
identify
hazardous conditions and apply hazard control measures
-
monitor
behavior trends
-
monitor
and evaluate health and safety standards
-
improve
health and safety standards
-
measure
performance
-
check
new facilities, equipment, processes, etc.
-
collect
data for meetings, support of initiatives, etc.
-
maintain
interest in health and safety
-
display
supervisory commitment to health and safety
-
As a bonus,
it has a noticeable effect on communication in the work area and
thus helps to improve and facilitate industrial relations and
enable the whole University community to play a more significant
role in the maintenance of a healthy and safe work environment.
However, it must be recognized that the full benefit of the
inspection process cannot be realized if action is not taken
based on the data collected.
-
INSPECTION
PROCEDURES
-
Who conducts
the inspection?
-
The
inspection team should be comprised of at least two
individuals. The OSD and one of the following:
-
the
Principal Investigator
-
manager of the unit
-
a
management representative, e.g., the relevant supervisor
-
a
workplace employee representative
-
The
Chair of the department or Manager of the unit should be
immediately notified of any and all discrepancies noted
during the inspection, and must sign the University of
Arizona Animal Hazards Program Identified Hazard Summary
Sheet prior to its being filed with the IACUC office.
-
When to
inspect?
-
A
joint inspection of the type described above should be done
at least on an annual basis, and is recommended on a
quarterly basis depending on the area. However, the OSD or
supervisor should monitor the workplace on a daily basis
(i.e., housekeeping, observation of behavior trends) and
more formally on a weekly - biweekly routine, checking such
things as environmental conditions, etc. Any identified
hazardous situations should be closely monitored at all
times, particularly while awaiting the implementation of
effective control measures.
-
Vary the
time of inspection to assure it is capturing the workplace
as it really is (i.e., unprepared).
-
How to
inspect?
-
The
Inspection Process:
(1) Using the University of Arizona Animal Hazards Program Health and Safety Checklist and Inspection Report Form (
(http://www.uac.arizona.edu/forms/uacformspage.shtml) as a guide, the inspection team should inspect all workplaces within the unit including office, storage, and maintenance areas. Previous Inspection Reports should be viewed prior to inspection.
(2) The inspection party should use the inspection checklist to consider:
(a) Workplace Design (i.e., the physical workplace)
i. ensure meets relevant legislative requirements
ii. ensure correct storage facilities
iii. assure ease of manual handling (a floor plan is helpful in preparing and recording findings)
iv. assure proper operation of chemical fume hoods and biological safety cabinets
(b) Work Practices
i. policy and procedures
ii. safe work procedures (written and accessible)
iii. information available to workers relating to hazards
iv. accident or injury data and reporting mechanisms
v. maintenance reports
vi. training provided
vii. personal hygiene
viii. good housekeeping
ix. proper waste disposal
x. proper handling, transportation, and restraint of animals
xi. provision and use of personal protective equipment
(c) Environment
i. e.g. noise, lighting, ventilation, thermal conditions
ii. assure meets all standards and guidelines
(d) Behavior
i. determine the effectiveness of systems in place
ii. identify the need for training and education programs
(3) The inspection party should ask themselves:
(a) What is wrong?
(b) Why is it wrong?
(c) What if...such and such happened?
-
RECORDING OBSERVATIONS
1. Observations made during the inspection must be recorded on the
University of Arizona Animal Hazards Program Health and Safety Inspection Checklist and Report Form. This ensures that issues raised are not forgotten and provides a valuable reference source for spot inspection and periodic checks by supervisors.
2. The Identified Hazard Summary Sheet with required signatures must be filed with the IACUC office and a copy kept at the work site to be available to IACUC, granting agency, and AAALAC site visitors.
3. New investigators, who have not commenced with animal work, will be allowed to waive the requirement for one year.
-
REVIEW: the inspection team should immediately
analyze the report and develop an action plan according to agreed
priorities.
-
FOLLOW UP
1. The information obtained from regular inspections should be reviewed carefully, not only to identify where immediate corrective action is needed, but also to identify trends as part of overall monitoring of the inspection programs effectiveness.
2. Analysis of inspection records over a period of time, for example:
a. highlights the need for training in certain areas
b. provides insight as to why accidents are occurring in particular areas
c. establishes priorities for corrective action
d. assists in improving or establishing healthy safe work practices
e. indicates areas, equipment, etc. which may require more detailed hazard analysis
3. Remember that inspections are only successful in accident prevention if deficiencies receive prompt corrective action.
-
NONCOMPLIANCE/NON-PARTICIPATION
-
Principal Investigators who do not file the University of Arizona Animal Hazards Program identified Hazard Summary Sheet as required:
a. Will not have subsequent protocol submissions reviewed until such time as the report has been filed.
b. Will have a hold imposed on all their protocols for animal ordering.
c. PIs will be allowed an additional two week period to become compliant, or provide acceptable written justification for why they need longer, before all facilities access for their research group (as identified in their protocols as participating personnel) will be deactivated in order that animals already on study will not be wasted.
-
Follow-Up Action: In the event that an individual is found in the facility after having their access withdrawn for being non-compliant, the PI will be required to attend a convened IACUC meeting to discuss this issue. If a satisfactory conclusion is not arrived at, all the PIs protocols may be subject to suspension, which would also require notification to the granting agency.
-
Persons will
be deemed non-compliant if they refuse to complete a Risk
Assessment Questionnaire, or do not file appropriate declination
forms.
In the event that an
individual is designated Non-Compliant the following actions will be
taken:
-
A letter from Occupational Health will
be forwarded to the individual, their OSD, or Supervisork and the
institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) office informing
them of the person's non-compliant status..
-
The Institutional Animal Care and Use
Committee (IACUC) will review the case and the following
consequences may be assessed:
-
No new or renewal protocols or
amendments will be reviewed for that individual.
-
A hold may be imposed on protocols
for animal ordering.
-
Facility access may be withdrawn.
-
The individual may be required to
attend a convened meeting with the IACUC.
-
Protocols may be suspended.
-
Non-participation:
-
Non-participation is designated when
an individual has filed a declination form indicating their decision
not to participate in certain aspects of the program:
-
Clinic Visit
-
Obtain recommended immunizations
or tests recommended by their animal hazard category.
-
Non-participation is not an option for
individuals working with primates, in studies involving potential
rabies exposure, or as otherwise mandated by the IACUC or their
supervisors.
Table 1. Examples of Selected Hazards in Animal Facilities
| Potential Risk of |
Due to |
Examples |
| Back Injury |
Lifting Pushing
Twisting
Falling |
feed bags cage racks
restraining large animals
slip on wet floor |
| Hearing Loss |
Noise |
cage wash areas, dog runs |
| Electrical Shock |
Faulty electrical wiring |
water on floor, ungrounded equipment |
| Puncture Wound |
Bite or scratch |
unrestrained animal |
| Needle stick |
Injecting or bleeding |
improper sharps disposal |
| Exposure |
Allergens |
animal hair, dander, serum, animal proteins |
| |
Biohazards |
human pathogens, zoonotic agents, latent or introduced |
| |
Chemicals |
hazardous materials on test, cleaning or decontaminating materials, acids for cage washers |
| |
Radiation |
Research isotopes. X-ray equipment |
TABLE 2. Rabies pre-exposure prophylaxis guide United States, 1999
|
RISK CATEGORY |
NATURE OF RISK |
TYPICAL POPULATIONS |
PREEXPOSURE RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
Continuous |
Virus present continuously, often in high concentrations. Specific exposures likely to go unrecognized. Bite, nonbite, or aerosol exposure. |
Rabies research laboratory workers;* rabies biologics production workers. |
Primary course. Serologic testing every 6 months; booster vaccination if antibody titer is below acceptable level.+ |
|
Frequent |
Exposure usually episodic, with source recognized, but exposure also might be unrecognized. Bite, nonbite, or aerosol exposure. |
Rabies diagnostic lab workers,* spelunkers, veterinarians and staff, and animal-control and wildlife workers in rabies-enzootic areas. |
Primary course. Serologic testing every 2 years; booster vaccination if antibody titer is below acceptable level.+ |
|
Infrequent (greater than population at large) |
Exposure nearly always episodic with source recognized. Bite or nonbite exposure. |
Veterinarians and animal-control and wildlife workers in areas with low rabies rates. Veterinary students. Travelers visiting areas where rabies is enzootic and immediate access to appropriate medical care including biologics is limited. |
Primary course. No serologic testing or booster vaccination. |
|
Rare (population at large) |
Exposure always episodic with source recognized. Bite or nonbite exposure. |
U.S. population at large, including persons in rabies-epizootic areas. |
No vaccination necessary |
*Judgment of relative risk and extra monitoring of vaccination status of laboratory workers is the responsibility of the laboratory supervisor (43).
+Minimum acceptable antibody level is complete virus neutralization at a 1:5 serum dilution by the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. A booster dose should be administered if the titer falls below this level.
Category of risk is determined by the category of animal contact you have been assigned to and review of the animal protocol you have submitted to IACUC. Anyone having exposure, or suspected exposure, to a rabies positive animal or tissues; or contact from a suspect animal that cannot be tested, or quarantined, for rabies, will undergo postexposure
prophylaxis therapy
It is the responsibility of the OSD to monitor the risk to students, student teachers, and lab workers and obtain the appropriate immunizations for them BEFORE exposure occurs. If there is any question as to whether someone should be immunized, contact Occupational Health Service.
Table 3.
Rabies postexposure prophylaxis guide United States 1999
|
ANIMAL TYPE |
EVALUATION AND DISPOSITION OF ANIMAL |
POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS RECOMMENDATIONS |
|
Dogs, cats, and ferrets |
Healthy and available for 10 days observation.
Rabid or suspected rabid.
Unknown (e.g., escaped) |
Persons should not begin prophylaxis unless animal develops clinical signs of rabies.*
Immediately vaccinate.
Consult public health officials. |
|
Skunks, raccoons, foxes and most other carnivores; bats |
Regarded as rabid unless animal proven negative by laboratory tests.+ |
Consider immediate vaccination. |
|
Livestock, small rodents, lagomorphs (rabbits and hares), large rodents (woodchucks and beavers), and other mammals |
Consider individually. |
Consult public health officials. Bites of squirrels, hamsters, guinea pigs, gerbils, chipmunks, rats, mice, other small rodents, rabbits, and hares almost never require antirabies postexposure prophylaxis. |
*During the 10-day observation period, begin postexposure prophylaxis at the first sign of rabies in a dog, cat, or ferret that has bitten someone. If the animal exhibits clinical signs of rabies, it should be euthanized immediately and tested.
+The animal should be euthanized and tested as soon as possible. Holding for observation is not recommended. Discontinue vaccine if immunofluorescence test results of the animal are negative.
Table 4.
Animal Hazard Program Category Summary Protocol
Category Summary and Basic
Occupational Health Care Recommendations (required
Immunizations)
Category
|
Type of Contact
|
|
1 |
Domesticated small mammals including rodents, rabbits |
|
2 |
Domesticated large mammals including dogs, cats, pigs, sheep, horses, cattle, goats |
|
3 |
Nonhuman primates (monkeys, chimpanzees) |
|
4 |
Wild caught rodents and small mammals |
|
5 |
Big game wildlife including deer, elk, mountain lions, bears |
|
6 |
Bird and poultry species, domesticated and wild |
|
7 |
Fish, reptiles, amphibians |
|
8 |
Support staff, maintenance staff, security staff (no dir | |